![]() |
Clinical Image
1 PGY-1 Resident Physician, Transitional Year, Orange Park Medical Center, Orange Park, Florida, USA
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
Address correspondence to:
Ankit Shah
MD, 2000 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, Florida 32610,
USA
Message to Corresponding Author
Article ID: 100013Z17MP2019
No Abstract
Keywords: Iridodialysis, Iris, McCannell
This case reports a 24-year-old male who presented with severe iridodialysis right eye (OD), along with several other ocular injuries including orbital fracture, eyelid laceration, hyphema, traumatic cataract, and lens subluxation following facial trauma. Preoperatively, the patient’s visual acuity OD was count fingers (CF) at 1' (Figure 1A). The slit lamp exam OD showed iridodialysis temporally and superiorly with fibrotic iris tissue and membrane on the anterior lens capsule (Figure 1B). A McCannell suture iridodialysis repair was performed by using two double-armed sutures and fixating the peripheral iris to the scleral wall, approximately 1 mm posterior to the limbus. This McCannell repair requires less manipulation than other methods of iridodialysis repair. Complex cataract extraction and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were completed concomitantly. Postoperatively, the patient’s visual acuity remained stable at CF, limited by a macula-involving choroidal rupture. This was discovered with adequate visualization of the posterior pole following the cataract extraction.
Our patient had a successful repair of his iridodialysis, as displayed through the preoperative and postoperative images. Though the vision could not be restored in our patient, the cause is attributable to a choroidal rupture and other damages he suffered secondary to the traumatic event. The McCannell suture technique applied in this case is an effective and minimally invasive option [1]. The double-armed McCannell suture method begins with one needle entering the anterior chamber through the corneoscleral limbus inferiorly [1]. It then pierces the iris base and exits the chamber angle and sclera [1]. A second needle is utilized in a similar fashion, entering from the same incision, but rather piercing the iris adjacent to the previous iris base site [1]. The suture is then tied over the sclera and buried [1]. Though it can be modified, typically a 10-0 polypropylene suture is used, which is consistent with our case [1],[2],[3]. The McCannell suture technique is not limited to iridodialysis repairs. For example, several cases have been reported showing its use for stabilizing previously subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lenses by attaching one or both haptics to the iris [2]. One potential complication of the double-armed McCannell suture technique is erosion of the suture through the superficial layers of the eye, though this is more likely to occur in children than in adults [3].
Our case reports the successful application of the double-armed McCannell suture technique for the repair of iridodialysis secondary to ocular trauma. This method does not require extensive manipulation of the eye, while yielding preferable results, with our case serving as a supporting example.
1.
Wachler BB, Krueger RR. Double-armed McCannell suture for repair of traumatic iridodialysis. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122(1):109–10. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
2.
Chang DF. Siepser slipknot for McCannel iris-suture fixation of subluxated intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(6):1170–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
3.
Brown SM. A technique for repair of iridodialysis in children. J AAPOS 1998;2(6):380–2. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
Munjal Pandya - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ankit Shah - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Guaranter of SubmissionThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of SupportNone
Consent StatementWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Conflict of InterestAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2019 Munjal Pandya et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.